God's Imitator

Chapter 130: Core Personnel of the Game

Wang Yongxin asked, "Officer Cao, do you mean that the stronger someone is, the easier they are to poach, so we should simply recruit weak people?"Cao Haichuan shook his head, "That's not entirely what I mean.

"From the perspective of solving games, of course the more smart people the better.

"But smart people also have issues of discourse power among themselves.

"For the same game, two smart people each have what they think is a better solution. Perhaps both solutions work, but they can't reach consensus and instead constrain each other.

"Then the smart person with weaker discourse power is very likely to be poached by other communities. Even if the other community's players might not be as strong, as long as this smart person can gain greater discourse power after going there, they'll have such motivation.

"So I think 'personnel composition structure' is more important.

"For example, Wang Yongxin, you and Lawyer Lin are both smart people in our community. If you enter the same game and think of the same strategy, or complementary strategies, naturally everyone's happy.

"But your thoughts are bound to differ, and your knowledge structures are different too. If you think of two different solutions in the same game but can only implement one, who do you think should compromise?"

Wang Yongxin fell into silence.

Obviously, he wouldn't be willing to compromise but he also had to admit that many times Lin Sizhi's ideas might be more comprehensive and complete.

Even if he verbally agreed to let Lin Sizhi make the final decision, in some special situations, he might still be more insistent on his own views, creating conflicts between them.

Zheng Jie weakly added, "I understand. It's like a basketball team with five players. Although each is a star player, there can still only be one commander. Otherwise, once discourse power allocation issues arise, even a galactic battleship can capsize in the gutter."

Cao Haichuan nodded, "Exactly. If it's a game with multiple community members participating, actually having one absolute core make decisions is enough.

"The remaining people don't need to make decisions. It's best if they can have different knowledge structures for supplementation, different divisions of labor, sufficient loyalty and execution ability."

Jiang He asked, "So how many cores do we specifically need?"

Cao Haichuan seemed to have thought about this question long ago, "From current game situations, multiplayer games might have 4-6 people participating, with 4 people being more common.

"Games like 'Blood Poker' with full participation are also split into three 4-person groups.

"Considering this, our 12 people only need 3 puzzle-solving cores in games.

"If there are more, we'd need to consider discourse power allocation issues between different cores. We must ensure that one person will definitely obey another before letting them enter the same game together."

Although Cao Haichuan didn't specify who the 3 puzzle-solving cores were, most people had a clear idea.

Lin Sizhi and Wang Yongxin definitely counted as two.

As for the third person, it could be Cao Haichuan, Cai Zhiyuan, or Li Renshu.

Of course, judging from current in-game performance, none of these three had shown effects as brilliant as Lin Sizhi but their performance in game reviews could also prove their abilities from the side.

Cao Haichuan and Cai Zhiyuan's last game was still 'King's Judgment,' but that game was quite special, with limited room for performance under mechanical constraints.

Among them, most community members certainly recognized Cao Haichuan more as the third in-game core.

In this situation, if they wanted to include a fourth in-game core, one person would have to be willing to give up in-game decision-making power and be content being a tool.

From the current perspective, none of the 3 people in the community seemed willing to give up decision-making power. So if they recruited a new core, would he be willing to give up decision-making power and completely follow the decisions of these three people in the community?

This was hard to say, smart people are all very opinionated.

And if this problem couldn't be solved after recruitment, with the defection mechanism updated in games, big problems could very likely arise.hen announced the vote count statistics.

"Cook 4 votes, nurse 5 votes, special forces 4 votes, farmer 2 votes, worker 3 votes, actuary 9 votes...

"So it seems we don't need a second vote. We can confirm it's a female actuary."